Developmental Sequence in Small Groups †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Developmental Sequence in Small Groups. Answer: Introducction: Groups are formed for different purposes they can be for social, political, or educational reasons. The foundation for designing these groups plays a major role to know the work and goals required for the accomplishment of tasks. In addition, the components for the unit framework are the general purpose and goals. According to Porges (2011), groups should not have broad goals no matter the mounting pressure from external or internal sources to cover expectations within the limited time. Consequently, teams lose their meaning of learning practice and clear understanding but instead become a master course and microscopic is absorbed, practiced and incorporated. However, if things do not seem to work out it is better to reconsider the scope and goals of the group and work on one agenda than multifaceted goals. Group members have the urgency to get acceptance by other members, so they set out selectiveness of gathering impressions of similarities, differences, and preferences of future sub grouping within the group. The rules of behavior and orientation to tasks and one another will be a foundation of the group (Tuckman Jensen 2005)).The next stage is storming. Here the group individuals have to blend and mould their cultures, beliefs, feelings, attitudes, and ideas to suit the group's objectives. However, they should also be able to solve power competitions and other group hostilities. The important aspect to determining if the group lasts the power of being attentive and assertive is the collaboration spirit, with a vibrant and social leader. According to Sollier (2005), group members engage in active acknowledgement and contribution of all group members and solving problems within the group. Leadership becomes engaging due to shared activities, and thus a level of trust brings out a sense of belonging and relief. Here the group has formed an unbreakable bond and may resist any future change. In these fourth stage members are working dependently because they are self-oriented, self-alluring, self-problem solving, and the objective is productivity. Lastly, the dissolving of the group, termination of tasks, recognition for participation and disengagement of relationships are applied in this level (Tuckman 2007) Group Decision Making Strategies According to the Tuckman Model, group membership is dictated by distinct factors such as team member's resources, group structure, group processes, and group tasks. The team's success will constitute what members individually bring with them (resources), their personality traits, abilities, and skills. The group structure manipulates the decisions made by the members, where the demands of the work and instructions revolve around the facilitators jurisdictions. The size determines the urgency and assignment constitution. It may require more people each with individual tasks to perform (Sollier 2005). However, the level of satisfaction seems higher in smaller groups compared to larger groups that are hard to come to arrive at an agreement. The teams will be set by the roles they are to perform. In fact, the diversification of roles, such as social groups characterized by maintenance positions where the work groups define the decision-making criteria. Apparently, norms shared among members determine the team's survival, relation, and express of units value during decision making. The groups decision-making rationale will anchor the dressing, performance and figure, and the extent of speech in respect to the mastery of language. The decision-making portfolio will chronicle around the important effective communication skills incorporated with equal participation chances for all members. There are various methods of communication each determined by the level of development infrastructure. The most common method targeted will be the electronic sources like phones; which enable us to make calls, sending emails instead of sending letters, which have not completely died out yet. Group discussions communication strategies are derived from the assignment topic (Tuckman 2007). Online forum discussions question and answer designs and live Collaborate sessions are some of the communication methods used. Live forums are more engaging and yield much and positive outcomes compared to the rest though they can intertwine. Communication builds on courage, which seems easier when maintained between age groups or people that ones used to associate because one can communicate even the negatives without creating conflict. Effective communication is a learned skill that is time-consuming and effort training, but as a result, skills are polished in time. There are pros and cons on one communication strategy over the other. Despite the fact that those online forums are timesaving during meetings lack of concentration comes in handy (Tuckman Jensen 2007). Phone indulgence, day dreaming only means that important point's pass and a student only ends up gaining nothing or half of what was expected. The dictation of negative body language is easier through one-on-one talk that can be solved immediately. Ultimately, the groups rationale in decision making will scrutinize the body language communication, views, perspectives and the interactive phase in decision makes process. Therefore, the discussion may stop and become the next meetings first agenda. Inconsistent body language and the emotional impact such as stress, anxiety may cause confusion and inappropriate nonverbal signals to fellow group members, which may alter proper decision-making, process (Tuckman 2005). Making effective communication dwell among the group members and tapping the skills, talents, and expertise of each group member will help to sustain viable and effective decision-making portfolio. Bibliography Tuckman, B. (2007). Developmental Sequence in Small Groups. Psychological Bulletin, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 34-67 Tuckman, B. Jensen, M. (2005). Stages of Small Group Development: Group and Organizational Studies, Prentice Hall: New York Porges, W. (2011). The Polyvagal Theory: Neurophysiologic Foundations of Emotions, Attachment, Communication, and Self-regulation, Norton Company: New York Sollier, P. (2005). Listening for Wellness: An Introduction to the Tomatis MethoDS, The Mozart Center Press: New York